Baptism and the Lord's Supper


Memory Verse

John 6:35



Introduction

"Their claim to respect and observance rests . . . on the simple fact that Christ has established (ordained) them and commanded their observance." Hiscox, p. 120

Definition: An ordinance is 'an outward sign of an inward grace', and is not a rite which transmits grace or produces spiritual operations. To most people, baptism and the Lord's supper are known as 'sacraments'
because they are 'sacred'. Actually, this term 'sacrament' was coined by the Roman Catholic Church and finds its origin in the Latin word 'sacramentum', which is a soldier's oath of allegiance and consecration to the military service in which he enlists. Since the Scriptures give no collective title for these ceremonies, Baptists use the word 'ordinance' to get away from the Catholic or other mystical connotations involved with the term 'sacrament'.



HOW MANY ORDINANCES ARE THERE?

Only two. The Roman Catholic Church lists confirmation, matrimony, orders, penace, and extreme unction as additional 'sacraments', but the Biblical justification for these rites is either nonexistent or the result of severe misinterpretation.

For instance, with matrimony (the ceremony of the wedding) we find no special commands from Christ with regard to how the ceremony should be observed. Of course, marriage is certainly Scriptural, but it was instituted by men long before Christ was on earth. Thus marriage may be a 'sacrament' in the Latin root's sense, since it involves the taking of vows, but it is not one of our Lord's ordinances.



BUT WHAT ABOUT FOOTWASHING? WASN'T IT COMMANDED BY JESUS?

Yes, in John 13:12-17 the Lord does command his disciples to wash each other's feet. However, Jesus could be giving this as one typical example of how believers should serve one another (see Jesus' similar teaching on this point in Mark 10:42-45 and Luke 22:25-27). In other words, Jesus is not establishing a ceremony here, but is graphically teaching by His own example that no Christian should regard himself as too important or spiritual to do 'ignoble' tasks, such as serving nursery duty or washing dishes after a church lunch.

In Acts we find no record that a footwashing ceremony was observed by the early church. Considering the frequent mention of baptism and the Lord's supper (termed the "breaking of bread"), it appears that the Apostles did not understand Jesus to be instituting an ordinance here; nor should we.



A. THE LORD'S SUPPER.

1. Instituted by Christ.

1 Corinthians 11:23-26 "For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, 'This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.' In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.' For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes."

See also Luke 22:19.
What is the purpose of this ceremony? Jesus said, "do this in remembrance of Me." We find no hint that taking the Lord's supper is essential for salvation; Jesus establishes it so that we will remember what a tremendous and bloody sacrifice He had to make in order to pay for our sins.

Note that Jesus says, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood." This is something to stop and think about: All of the great and precious promises which we find in the New Testament have been written in Jesus' blood. Without Christ's perfect sacrifice for our sins, God could only give us what our rebellion deserves: eternal torment in hell.

2. We are to repeat it.

Note 1 Corinthians 11:26, quoted above. From Acts we find that the ,early church often celebrated the Lord's supper.

3. Self-examination precedes it.

1 Corinthians 11:27-32 "Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment."

We should not take the Lord's supper flippantly, or while rebelliously clinging to favorite sins, or in any other light-hearted manner. The purpose of the Lord's supper, as we saw above, is to remind us of Christ's death on the cross to pay for our sins. To take the Lord's supper without being genuinely thankful for Christ's atonement on our behalf, and without having examined ourselves, confessed our sins, and sincerely asked the Lord's help in overcoming them, is regarded by the Lord as a mockery: we are then toasting our own judgment. Certainly the unbeliever or rebellious believer who takes the Lord's supper is committing a great sin.

4. CONCLUSIONS:

a. Taking the Lord's supper DOES NOT save (regenerate) a person.

Remember Ephesians 2:8-9, and Titus 3:5. Taking the Lord's supper is not a means which the Lord uses to wash away our sins or to apply Christ's atonement to our credit, for Abraham did not receive the Lord's supper in order to be saved (cf. Romans 4 and Galatians 3). For a detailed discussion of this, see Appendix C to the Justification lesson.

Only John 6 can be twisted to go against Jesus' statement that its' purpose is to remind us of Him. This passage is covered in Appendix B of the Justification notes.

b. The Lord's supper IS NOT a means of grace.

Roman Catholics and even Lutherans argue that when one takes the Mass, one receives special power from the Holy Spirit through the means of the bread and the cup. This special power can only be received by taking the Mass. Whether the Holy Spirit is constrained to distribute His special blessings by means of human ceremonies is the question here.


Note that Paul argues in Galatians 3:14, "He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit." If we receive the Spirit by faith alone (as is clear in the context), then no human ceremony must be necessary. Certainly Abraham, the great example of faith, probably did not receive the Mass, and certainly was not baptized (The purpose of circumcision is given in Romans 4; it is not a 'means of grace' either). In light of these Scriptures we understand that the sovereign God of the universe is not limited by human rites in His dealings with men. The Holy Spirit can regenerate, bless, and sanctify men by working directly in their hearts.

Some will argue that, while taking the Lord's supper is not essential for a person's salvation, it is nevertheless a special means for receiving God's grace. In a very limited sense this is true: When we examine ourselves as we are commanded, the Holy Spirit can use this opportunity to convict us of sins which we were previously unaware of, and bring us to repentance in that area. Of course under this definition, reading and studying the Scriptures are 'means of grace.' However, in view of the Catholic and Lutheran definition of 'means of grace', and especially since the Scriptures never use this term, for informed believers to cling to this terminology only results in confusion. It is better to recognize that the Holy Spirit is the true 'Means of Grace', and to find more
fitting words with which to describe the ceremony of the Lord's supper.

c. The Lord's supper IS a symbol.

The Lord's supper is a symbol given by Jesus to remind us of His work of redemption. It should be taken seriously yet joyously.



B. BAPTISM.

What is baptism and what is it about? This section deals with these topics.

1. It is commanded by Christ.

Matthew 28:19 "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."

2. To be done only to believers.

Acts 16:30-34 "He then brought them out and asked, 'Men, what must I do to be saved?' They replied, 'Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved - you and your household.' Then they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all the others in his house. At that hour of the night the jailer took them and washed their wounds; then immediately he and all his family were baptized. The jailer brought them into his house and set a meal before them, and the whole family was filled with joy, because they had come to believe in God."

Some argue that because the Philippian jailer's whole household was baptized (and of course, since he must have had small children in his family), it is Scriptural to baptize infants. Note however that "they spoke the word of the Lord . . . to all the others in his house," and that "the whole family was filled with joy, because they had come to believe in God." This inspired commentary strongly implies that everyone in the jailer's household was old enough to intelligently believe in God.

Note also that Jesus commanded in Matthew 28:19 to baptize disciples, not their children. See also: Acts 2:38,41; 8:12-13; 9:18; 10:44-48; 18:8. In all of these passages we find that the early church only baptized professed believers.

Why then do people insist on baptizing infants? Because of arguments derived from Colossians 2:11-12:
"In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God."

Since Paul makes this comparison between baptism and circumcision, people argue that baptism is the 'sign of the new covenant', as circumcision was the sign of the old covenant. Therefore, since FT believers circumcised their infants, New Testament believers should baptize their infants.

There are several problems with this analysis: first of all, note that in the verse quoted above, a believer is "raised with him through (his) faith in the power of God." Would we apply this verse to a person who is baptized but has no faith in the power of God? Since faith is confidence in God based on knowledge, how can we apply this verse to an infant who has no knowledge of God?

Secondly, we are making an assumption that baptism is a sign of the new covenant, and such a statement is never explicitly made in the Scriptures. If any ordinance is a 'sign of the new covenant' it is the Lord's supper, since Jesus said, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood."

Thirdly, notice that the circumcision that counts is NOT the one done by the hands of men: it is rather the circumcision done by Christ in the heart. How can we say that the water baptism done by men does anything, when we know from 1 Peter 3:21 that what counts is the pledge of a good conscience towards God (cf. also John 1:12)?

Given such weak Scriptural grounds, it is wise to consider infant baptism in the following category:

"They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men. You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men" (Mark 7:7-8).

Jesus rebuked the Pharisees because they held to their traditions (which had Scriptural rationalizations) more than they held to God's word. Certainly we should be careful lest we fall into this trap and find ourselves worshipping the Lord in vain.

3. Symbolizes (pictures):

a. The death and burial of our sin nature with Christ, and our walk in newness of life.

Romans 6:4-5 "We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life."

b. A circumcision of the heart.

Colossians 2:11-12 Quoted above.

c. The Holy Spirit's washing of regeneration.

Titus 3:5 "He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit."



4. NOT necessary for salvation.

Romans 6:2-3 "We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? Or don't you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?"

Again the important question here is: Which baptism makes us dead to sin? The baptism of the Holy Spirit or the baptism of water?

For a thorough answer to this, see Appendix C in the Justification notes.

However, it is worth noting the following verses (NOTE: This is new material, not a review!):

1 Corinthians 1:17 "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel - not with words of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power."

Would Paul have made a statement like this if baptism were essential for salvation?

1 Corinthians 12:13 "For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body - whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free - and we were all given one Spirit to drink."


This verse strengthens Romans 8:9, 13, where Paul asserts that a person is not even saved unless he has the Spirit of Christ. Refer to Appendix C for coverage of the question: 'But when do we receive the Holy Spirit?'

John 16:8 "When he comes, he will convict the world of guilt in regard to sin and righteousness and judgment."

Certainly the Holy Spirit can work in the world to convict men of sin without having everyone first be baptized]

1 Corinthians 10:1-5 is particularly noteworthy:
"For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brethren, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. They all ate the same spiritual food and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them, for their bodies were scattered over the desert. Now these things occurred as examples, to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did."

Note that Paul is arguing here that the baptism and spiritual food and drink which the Israelites received from Christ had no 'magical' properties in it, for most of those who received it remained unsaved (God was not pleased with them, see Hebrews 4:1-11). If these things happened to them as examples for us, how can we twist the Scriptures so that they appear to teach that the act of baptism does some special spiritual operation, when the FT baptism of Israel did not?

6. The apostles considered baptism to be a complete immersion in water, not a sprinkling or pouring.

a. This preserves the imagery of burial in Romans 6:4, and Colossians 2:12.

b. Examples:

Acts 8:38-39 "Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him. When they came up out of the water . . . ."

Matthew 3:16 "As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water."

John 3:23 "And John also was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because there was much water there . . . ."

These and other descriptions of baptism in the Scriptures imply immersion, as does the meaning of the Greek word 'baptizo' (immerse) itself.
For more details, see:

Bible Baptism, by Keith L. Brooks.

Baptism, a paper by pastor Eck.

The New Directory for Baptist Churches, by Hiscox,
chapters XV and XVII.

CONCLUSION:

Baptism, like the Lord's supper, is a symbolic ceremony, representing the Holy Spirit's washing of regeneration. We observe it, not in order to receive grace, but simply because Jesus commanded it. This simple obedience follows from our gratitude that "the love of God has been poured out within our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us" (Romans 5:5).


The significance of baptism as witnessed to by the New Testament

Upon surveying the various instances of baptism in the New Testament, it appears that those that speak to the question of significance fall into five categories of meaning, four of which are outward signs of unseen spiritual realities, and one of which is an outward mark of profession.

(1) Baptism signifies union with Christ and with the benefits of His redemption

The ordinance of water baptism is so closely associated with that act of the Holy Spirit that savingly unites us, through faith, to Christ and to the benefits of His redemptive work, that both the outward baptism and the inward (i.e., Spirit) baptism are referred to by the same term BAPTIZO.

(a) Romans 6:3-6 - "Or do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death? Therefore we have been buried with Him through the baptism into death, in order that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life. For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, certainly we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, that our body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves to sin"

This passage speaks of the justified man's death to sin (depravity). Here the question must be asked: Does water baptism instrumentally bring about either positional or experiential death to sin? If not, then the passage cannot be speaking of the ordinance of baptism, but must be speaking of the Spirit baptism. In such a case, the passage can be used rightly in connection with the subject of water baptism only if water baptism signifies Spirit baptism.

(b) Galatians 3:26-29 - "For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to the promise."

Verse 27 has been viewed as representing either the ordinance of baptism or Spirit baptism. However, if water baptism is opted for, some pointed questions must be asked. Does water baptism make us sons of God? Does it "clothe us with Christ"? Does water baptism make us all "one in Christ"? Does water baptism make us Christ's, Abraham's seed, and heirs of the promise? In an outward sense water baptism can "clothe us with Christ" and "make us Christ's," in terms of outward profession. But can professions of faith make us sons of God, and make us all one in Christ, Abraham's seed, and heirs of the promise? The answer quite definitely appears to be that only Spirit baptism can accomplish these spiritual realities. This passage can thus be used rightly in connection with the subject of water baptism only if the ordinance signifies Spirit baptism into union with Christ and with the benefits of His redemption.

(c) Colossians 2:11-13 - (the intricacy of this passage calls for a rather literal translation):

"in whom (Christ) also ye were circumcised (1st Aor. Ind. Pass. of PERITEMNO) with a circumcision made without hands (or, not hand-made) in (or, by) the putting off of the body of the flesh, in (or, by) the circumcision of Christ (or, by Christian circumcision--a Genitive of
characteristic), having been buried together with (2nd Aor. Pass. Part. Nom. Pl. Masc. of SUNTHAPTO) Him in (or, by) the baptism, in which also ye were raised up together (1st Aor. Ind. Pass. of SUNEGEIRO) through (or, by means of) the faith of the operation of God, the one raising (1st Aor. Act. Part. Gen. Sing. of EGEIRO) Him from the dead. And you (Acc.) being dead in the sins and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, you He made alive together (1st Aor. Ind. Act. of SUZOPOIEO) with Him, forgiving (1st Aor. Part. Nom. Sing. Masc. of CHARIZOMAI) us all the sins."

And with the mechanics removed we have the following:

"in whom also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by the putting off of the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried together with Him by baptism, by which also you were raised up together through faith in the operation of God, the one who raised Him from the dead. And you, being dead in sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made alive together with Him, forgiving us all the sins."

This is clearly not a physical circumcision of which the apostle is speaking (it is "made without hands"), but a spiritual cutting off of "the flesh," accomplished by the circumcision of Christ. This spiritual circumcision takes place through baptism. However, it is not the ordinance of baptism that is referred to, since the baptism spoken of actually buries believers with respect to sin and raises them to spiritual life. Thus baptism circumcises and buries and makes alive. It is not the external ordinance, but the spiritual baptism that accomplishes this effect. This baptism is called Spirit baptism, since it is the Holy Spirit who unites us to Christ through faith and circumcises us and makes us spiritually alive.

The teaching of this passage in an abbreviated form is thus: "you who were dead and uncircumcised were circumcised and made alive through union with Christ" (as accomplished by the Holy Spirit). Once again, this passage can be used rightly in connection with the subject of water baptism only if the ordinance signifies Spirit baptism.

(2) Baptism signifies cleansing from the pollution of sin

(a) Colossians 2:11-13 (previously quotes in (1) (c))

This passage, in addition to its emphasis on union with Christ, also speaks of spiritual circumcision--a cutting off of "the flesh" by the circumcision of Christ. If "flesh" represents our sinful nature, then in some sense we are cleansed from depravity by Spirit baptism. Since in our union with Christ we die decisively to the ruling power of depravity, and are made alive decisively to the ruling power of righteousness, we can properly speak of this first phase of subjective sanctification (regeneration) in terms of cleansing from the pollution of sin. Water baptism signifies this cleansing from depravity.

(b) Titus 3:5 - "He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit."

Although the word BAPTIZO is not used in this verse, nevertheless the "washing" spoken of can be and frequently is mentioned in discussions of baptism. Here it is regeneration that washes or cleanses us from the pollution of sin. Water baptism signifies cleansing from depravity.

(3) Baptism signifies cleansing from the guilt of sin

(a) Colossians 2:13 - "And you, being dead in sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made alive together with Him, forgiving us all the sins."

In the act of Spirit baptism the believer is not only spiritually circumcised and buried to sin and raised to spiritual life; he is also forgiven all of his sins. Forgiveness speaks of being cleared of guilt through the redemptive work of Christ, which clearing occurs at Justification. Water baptism thus signifies cleansing from guilt.

(b) Acts 2:38 - "And Peter said to them, 'Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."

Peter tells his hearers to receive the ordinance of baptism (which they did, in verse 4) for (or, unto) forgiveness of their sins. When we are united, through faith, to Christ in Spirit baptism, our sins are forgiven. The ordinance of water baptism signifies this cleansing from guilt; it does not accomplish it. Only the application of the blood of Christ brings forgiveness of sins, but the ordinance of baptism signifies and seals to us this forgiveness. Those who repent and believe on Christ and then receive water baptism are assured, by the visible sign, of forgiveness of sins.
That which is invisible (the cleansing away of our sins by the blood of Christ), God represents to us by that which is visible (the rite of water baptism). The ordinance of baptism is thus God's visible sign and seal of forgiveness of sins to those who trust in Christ and are unity to Him and to the benefits of His redemption.

(c) Acts 22:16 - Paul, in recounting his conversion experience, quotes the words of Ananias: "And now, why do you linger? Stand up and receive baptism, and cleanse away your sins, calling on His name."

Here the ordinance of baptism signifies a washing, a cleansing away of sins. This cleansing takes place the moment we trust in Christ and are justified, when our sins are forgiven on the ground of the blood of Christ. Thus the ordinance of baptism does not bring about the cleansing, but does signify it. And yet here the significance is so close between the sign and the reality signified that Ananias can say "receive baptism and cleanse away your sins."

(d) I Peter 3:21 - Peter makes reference to the eight persons who were saved from the great Flood by means of the ark, and then says: "whose antitype, baptism, now saves you also -- not the putting off of the filth of the flesh, but the answer to God of a good conscience -- through the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

The word translated "answer" is EPEROTEMA. This word is a hapax, but its cognate verb EPEROTAO is used 59 times in the New Testament, and means "to ask." or "to demand." How do we derive "answer" from the act of asking? The idea in the verse seems to be that God asks or interrogates the conscience, and the conscience answers back. If a man's sins have never been forgiven, then when God asks the conscience, it answers "Guilty." But if his sins have been cleansed by the blood of Christ, and if he has been declared righteous on the basis of Christ's imputed righteousness, then his conscience answer "Not guilty" and "Righteous." Thus Peter says that baptism saves -- not the ordinance of baptism that physically washes the body, but the spiritual reality that water baptism signifies, namely the spiritual cleansing of the conscience that enables it to give a good response to God. And Christ's resurrection demonstrates and gives assurance that our sins have been fully expiated, and that God has accepted Christ's atonement as full payment for our sins! Water baptism therefore signifies a cleansing of the conscience from the guilty of sin.

(e) Hebrews 10:22 - "let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water."

Here an internal cleansing of the conscience is coupled with an external cleansing of the body. If "the body having been washed with pure water" refers to the ordinance of baptism (what else could it refer to?), and if there is any connection between water baptism and internal cleansing of the conscience (I Peter 3:21 certainly teaches that there is such a connection), then the ordinance of baptism signifies cleansing from the guilty of sin.

(4) Baptism signifies entrance into the Body of Christ, the Church

I Corinthians 12:12-13 - "For even as the body is one and yet has many members, and all the members of the body, though they are many, are one body, so also is Christ. For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit."

The Spirit of God, by uniting us to Christ through faith, has also united us to all the members of Christ's Body, the Church. Thus the ordinance of baptism signifies the spiritual reality of entrance into the Church through union with Christ.

(5) Baptism signifies identification, through profession, as a disciple of Christ, and with the visible church.

(a) Matthew 28:18-20 - "And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, 'All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."

Implied in the making of disciples (followers of Christ) is the credible profession of persons confessing Christ as Savior and Lord, on the basis of which profession the ordinance of baptism is administered.

(b) Acts 2:37-38, 41 - "Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, 'Brethren, what shall we do?' And Peter said to them, 'Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. . . . So then, those who had received his word were baptized; and there were added that day about three thousand souls."

No doubt these three thousand persons made profession of their repentance and trust in Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins, and on this basis they were baptized, and became identified as disciples of Christ.

(c) Acts 8:12-13, 18-24 - "But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women alike. And even Simon himself believed; and after being baptized, he continued on with Philip; and as he observed signs and great miracles taking place, he was constantly amazed. . . . Now when Simon saw that the Spirit was bestowed through the laying on of the apostles' hands, he offered them money, saying, 'Give this authority to me as well, as that everyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit.' But Peter said to him, 'May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could obtain the gift of God with money! You have no part or portion in this matter, for your heart is not right before God. Therefore repent of this wickedness of yours, and pray the Lord that if possible, the intention of your heart may be forgiven you. For I see that you are in the gall of bitterness and in the bondage of iniquity.' But Simon answered and said, 'Pray to the Lord for me yourselves, so that nothing of what you have said may come upon me.'"

These people of Samaria believed, i.e., made profession of their faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ; and they were baptized on the basis of that profession. They became identified as disciples of Christ. Simon the magician also believed, i.e., made profession of his faith in Christ; and was baptized. But his profession was an empty one, for he was not a true disciple of Christ.

(d) Acts 8:36-38 - "And as they went along the road they came to some water; and the eunuch said, 'Look! Water! What prevents me from being baptized?' ((And Philip said, 'If you believe with all your heart, you may.' And he answered and said, 'I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God')) And he ordered the chariot to stop; and they both went down into the water, Philip as well as the eunuch; and he baptized him."

The Ethiopian eunuch professed faith in Christ and desired baptism; on the basis of his profession Philip baptized him, and he became a disciple of Christ.

(e) Acts 18:8 - ". . . and many of the Corinthians when they heard were believing and being baptized." On the basis of their profession the Corinthians were baptized and thus became identified with Christ as His disciples.


Contributed by FM